http://todayhumor.co.kr/board/view.php?kind=&ask_time=&search_table_name=&table=sisa&no=128086&page=2&keyfield=&keyword=&mn=&nk=&ouscrap_keyword=&ouscrap_no=&s_no=128086&member_kind=

http://todayhumor.co.kr/board/view.php?kind=&ask_time=&search_table_name=&table=sisa&no=128081&page=2&keyfield=&keyword=&mn=&nk=GTX580SLI&ouscrap_keyword=&ouscrap_no=&s_no=128081&member_kind=

http://todayhumor.co.kr/board/view.php?kind=&ask_time=&search_table_name=&table=bestofbest&no=58574&page=3&keyfield=&keyword=&mn=&nk=&ouscrap_keyword=&ouscrap_no=&s_no=58574&member_kind=

이거 말고도 멕시코? FTA 후 잘못된걸 보았습니다.

사실 이번에 FTA의 경우는 잘못되었다고 생각을 했는데요,사실 반대의 이유는..

1. 미국이 절대 찬성 하였기 때문에 = 미국에 이익이 돼기 때문에 => 한국은 피해를 받기 때문에

2. 나꼼수의 영향 => BBK 관련한 구속력을 이번 FTA로 퉁칠려고 하는 것일 수 도 있다..?

일단 이정도 였습니다.

하지만, 위의 글들을 보고 어느정도, 왜 반대를 하는지에 대해서는 알고 어느정도 이해를 했는데요..

사실 FTA협정 자체를 읽어 본것이 아니기 때문에 이정희의원처럼 조목조목 따질수가 없더라구요..?

다른분들이 작성하신 글을 읽으면서도 찬성하는 분들의 논리도 이해가 되고, 반대 하시는 분들 의견도 이해가 되구요... 

사실 법이나, 협상이란게 해석하기 나름이자나요? 그래서 더욱 그런거 같더라구요...

이번에 FTA 협상한거 번역본 같은걸 구해서 봤으면 좋겠는데... 혹시 보신분들 계신가요? 아까 보니 오타 이야기 나오는거 봐서 나온거 같기도 한데...

아무튼 이번 FTA 자체는 반대를 하는 것이 맞는거 같아요. 시장의 규모가 차이가 나는데 떳떳하게 일대일로 싸우자! 는 아닌거 같네요..

국회의원들이 좀더 현명한 선택 ( 자기 자신을 위해서가 아니라 국가 전체를 위한..)을 하기를 바랄 뿐이네요..ㅠㅠ