(문제 유형 : GMAT Assumpton question)
Many Businesses hire consultants to formulate plans to manage impending growth, and businesses that hire consultants do subsequently perform bettter than those that do not. Yet many Consultants acknowledge that the advise offered by consultants is not insightful and that in many cases their advice is actually ignored. It is clear then that whatever the reason for these businesses' increased performance, it is not the advice given by the consultants hired.
Which of the following, if true, would weaken the argument above?
A)A consultant can be trusted when he or she provides information about the value of his or her own advice.
B)When preparing for the future, the quality of potential strategies considered is less important than the quantity.
C)The core leadership at a business should be expected to know more about the businesses' needs than an outsider.
D)Businesses that are unable to afford the expense of hiring consultants are unlikely to successfully manage impending growth.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
지문 주장 & 문제: 더 많은 퍼포먼스를 이루게 되더라도 회사가 고용한 컨설턴트의 도움 때문은 아니다. 다음 문항중 주장을 뒷받침하지 않는 것을 고르시오.
교재에서 이 지문 답은 B라고 말하며, A,C,D는 주장을 뒷받침(Strengthens)해주기 때문에 답이 아니라고 합니다.
->(B) presents this alternative explanation of how a consultant's uninsightful and unfollowed advice might be of benefit, by providing a greater number of strategies to choose between.
묻는 문제는 Which of the following, if true, would weaken the argument above?, 지문의 주장을 뒷받침하지 않는 것을 찾아야 되는거 아닌가요?(컨설턴트의 도움은 퍼포먼스에 도움이 된다/될수 있다..를 찾아야 되는거). 근데 해답지에 따르면 왜 B가 답이 되고 오히려 주장을 support 하지 않고 weaken성향을 띄는 선택지들은 strengthens라고 해서 답이 아니라고 말하는건지 이해가 안됩니다.
제 독해가 잘못된건지 어떤 부분을 놓친건지 도움 부탁드립니다
글쓰기