http://blog.naver.com/PostView.nhn?blogId=lifesavior&logNo=110134882236




깔끔하게 정리했더군요.





제가 봐도, 문대성 논문은 절대 표절이 아니네요.

보통 표절은 뉘앙스를 다르게 한다거나 어미의 변화를 준다거나 하는 노력이라도 하죠.

오탈자 위치까지 동일한 수준이면, 전문용어로 따로 부르는게 있죠.



바로 '제본'이죠












===================================================================================
여기서 퍼왔어요..
http://mlbpark.donga.com/mbs/articleV.php?mbsC=bullpen&mbsIdx=690380&cpage=1&mbsW=&select=&opt=&keyword=